Controlling your money and where you spend it
how stupid must you be to vote for these people.
how stupid must you be to vote for these people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because billionaires work in sums of $600. Lulz.Controlling your money and where you spend it
how stupid must you be to vote for these people.
Because billionaires work in sums of $600. Lulz.
Sadly our voters really are this stupid.
I wonder just how many new employees banks will have to add to the payrolls, hell, I write dozens of checks over $600 monthly . I would venture most of you do as well !
I hate to interrupt this circle jerk of dumbfukkery, but there already were measures in place for the government to be alerted on $1000 dollar transactions. So its completely free trade capitalism, until moving the number down $400 becomes "Marxism"...to be able to monitor the movement of money in a free market economy. You doofuses don't understand your own boogeyman buzzwords.
Holy crap are you stupid. The FDIC says so, from the list of grounds for alerting them on non-accredited agencies, to combat money laundering...It’s $10,000 dumbass….not $1000
That is correct, banks have to report any transaction over $10,000 . Friend of mine was fired from a bank for not completing the forms on her fathers transactions. he would have many any given week and she would only report a partial list. She said the forms were a bitch to complete .IRS Rules for Depositing More Than $10,000 Cash in a Bank Account
Learn the laws and bank rules for depositing more than $10,000 in cash. Find out whether these transactions will be reported to the IRS for suspicious activity.
By Paul Sisolak
Updated: Aug 26, 2021
Used to work in financial services industry. Even if you didn’t touch the $ every employee had to take mandatory compliance training for FINRA/SEC compliance. $10k was the threshold. They also warned about multiple transactions under $10k that people might use to skirt the reg. There was also an automatic hold on any deposit over $10k.That is correct, banks have to report any transaction over $10,000 . Friend of mine was fired from a bank for not completing the forms on her fathers transactions. he would have many any given week and she would only report a partial list. She said the forms were a bitch to complete .
You can tag me or quote me, coward. Let me help you: They are both on the books. Yours is for banks only. Mine is for all other financial institutions.Knowing you’ve never dealt with $10,000 transactions, I understand how you could be so stupid
Form 8300 and Reporting Cash Payments of Over $10,000 | Internal Revenue Service
Generally, if you're in a trade or business and receive more than $10,000 in cash in a single transaction or in related transactions, you must file Form 8300.www.irs.gov
You can tag me or quote me, coward. Let me help you: They are both on the books. Yours is for banks only. Mine is for all other financial institutions.
As an executive in the financial services industry I would say this is correct as it pertains to “currency transactions” hence the currency transaction report (CTR), multiple transactions are considered “structuring” which is prohibited. The proposals being considered by our American Marxist’s are not ONLY currency transactions over $600 but ALL transactions over $600.Used to work in financial services industry. Even if you didn’t touch the $ every employee had to take mandatory compliance training for FINRA/SEC compliance. $10k was the threshold. They also warned about multiple transactions under $10k that people might use to skirt the reg. There was also an automatic hold on any deposit over $10k.
Banks may reserve the right to put a hold on deposits over a certain threshold below $10k that’s more for overdraft/risk protection vs regulatory compliance.
That's a weird way to say you were wrong about the drop to $600.You can tag me or quote me, coward. Let me help you: They are both on the books. Yours is for banks only. Mine is for all other financial institutions.
That's a weird way to say you were wrong about the drop to $600.
Exactly.As an executive in the financial services industry I would say this is correct as it pertains to “currency transactions” hence the currency transaction report (CTR), multiple transactions are considered “structuring” which is prohibited. The proposals being considered by our American Marxist’s are not ONLY currency transactions over $600 but ALL transactions over $600.
Not being wrong about your transactions at a financial institution being already under scrutiny at $1000 is a weird way to be “wrong”, but now you people are just “backpeddling” 😆.That's a weird way to say you were wrong about the drop to $600.
So you were just wrong.You can tag me or quote me, coward. Let me help you: They are both on the books. Yours is for banks only. Mine is for all other financial institutions.
Holy crap are you stupid. The FDIC says so, from the list of grounds for alerting them on non-accredited agencies, to combat money laundering...
Non-bank financial institutions or agents thereof (this definition includes telegraph companies, and money services businesses [currency exchange, check casher, or issuer of monetary instruments in an amount greater than $1,000 to any person in one day.
LOL...you just moved the goal posts.
The IRS wants to know about $600 moving from accredited bank to accredited bank. As @Orange_N_White just told you, currently that number is $10,000.
You bring up unaccredited institutions as though it is relevant to this conversation. It isn't.
Stupid or just intellectually dishonest? No one GAF...just stfu already.
I remember back in high school there was this little bitch kid that played baseball for our rival, and he would always talk shit from the bench. When he got his opportunity to get in the game, he’d wave his bat around like he was Barry Bonds (looked and acted more like Barry Manilow).He really is stupid
LOL, all I could think about was this…Lesson: Talking out of your ass doesn’t get you any respect. I will break you.
The mouthy ones are always the ones that suck the most. Great story.I remember back in high school there was this little bitch kid that played baseball for our rival, and he would always talk shit from the bench. When he got his opportunity to get in the game, he’d wave his bat around like he was Barry Bonds (looked and acted more like Barry Manilow).
Anyway, the very last time we played them he started the game (batted last of course), and I got to pitch. Much like I do with @Menace Sockeyes on a daily basis, I made it clear who was boss. That weak little puke batted 3 times in that game, and naturally I pegged the shit out of him all three times.
Lesson: Talking out of your ass doesn’t get you any respect. I will break you.