So, if you're going to have some form of moving teams based on sustained level of play, there aren't that many schools to consider. If you do it, you would have to have some parameters and have a committee judge each on a case-by-case basis, while also allowing an appeals process (Massachusetts does this). For instance, Regina and St. Albert have established themselves as incredibly dominate teams in 1A over the last 10 years (part of that in 2A for Regina). Their sustained level of play could justify that each play up a class (2A) in football for two years even though enrollment puts them in 1A. The move would be re-evaluated after two years, and could be appealed based on non-obvious factors (e.g. significant enrollment drop, loss of big-time players, etc.).
But I really don't see any other schools that you would do that to. Heelan was 4A until about 2007, where they had some success but were not great. Then they became a really good team in 3A, especially with McCabe and Wegher, but even so have been beaten in the playoffs by powerhouses Harlan (twice), Solon, and Decorah. Do you move all of those teams up to 4A where they likely become above average like Heelan once was? That seems dumb, and you'll never have a "storied" program again unless its a legit 4A team like Valley.
What would make more sense, and Massachusetts also does this, would be to not move teams up so much, but rather move teams down. They often do this with their "vocational/technical high schools" (which have much lower participation rates) or fledgling programs in order to give them a fighting chance at winning some games and maybe making a playoff run from time to time. For an example of how this looks, read this article about a team in Mass making an appeal last year to move down:
http://www.gazettenet.com/home/3602831-95/division-program-programs-teams
This post was edited on 11/21 9:45 AM by hackeysack