Is this the longest thread in the history of IA Preps yet?
Would have to check some of the Regina/multiplier threads from 6-7 years ago.
Is this the longest thread in the history of IA Preps yet?
If that's the case then I agree some of that can be ramped down...although the flip side of that is that it's just extremely difficult when kids have been taught that style and have played it in AAU ball and see it on TV in the NBA to put the reigns on it. It's almost like playing a completely different sport if you're used to playing run and gun and then you tell them Ok, now no fast breaks, no 3s, etc. I'm not completely 100% defending it, I'm just saying it's not as easy a solution as some are making it out to be.
Where were these people crying sportmanship when Danville was on their run several years ago? They ran through their regular season by putting up some wide margin games and no one criticized them for it.
I am guessing they were if they were doing it the same way.
The question is should they be doing it no matter what team it is? My guess is people complained about Danville but maybe not on this site. Was this site around then? Why does it seem like there is only 1 team doing this or is there more this year?
Not yet.Is this the longest thread in the history of IA Preps yet?
Hey not everything has to be about Regina....Would have to check some of the Regina/multiplier threads from 6-7 years ago.
What year? IaPreps was around well before they won back to back titles in 2001-2002......The question is should they be doing it no matter what team it is? My guess is people complained about Danville but maybe not on this site. Was this site around then? Why does it seem like there is only 1 team doing this or is there more this year?
Hey not everything has to be about Regina....
I remember conference basketball threads that would stretch into the tens and almost 20s of pages. And yeah any private school thread about 10 years ago was guaranteed many multiple pages......Today if you can get 3 pages out of the private school argument that would be something.
Regular season finale:
North Linn 106 Alburnett 33
18-1 in the 4 qtr (starters still in the game)
40 points scored on a running clock
95 of the points scored by the starters.
Congrats on a perfect season.
Actually, the starters were not still in the game, they were put back in the game! Say what you want about the score, but it was for the purpose of making a statement in our house. Not that it would have made a difference, but we were down our versatile big man, Izic Mackey. He sprained his ankle pretty bad at the end of last week. If you know anything about rivalries, this is a big one in every sport! The players will beat the tar out of each other on the playing surface and then shake hands and chat after the game.
As for the rosters that I mentioned last week, there were 10 on the JV bench and 11 on the Varsity. Of those, I counted 5 that played both games, I believe.
Disgraceful.
95 of 106 points. A 73 point win.
That said, Alburnett must have about as much fight and pride in them as APir8Dad seems to. Which is practically none. Never seen someone be such an apologist for a team that absolutely disrespects and embarrasses their own kids team like that.
The starters were put back into the game in the 4th quarter of this game? Did I read that right? To make a statement?
Payback from football.
Well I have (kinda) been defending them throughout this thread but if that's really what happened then that's sad.Payback from football.
Well I have (kinda) been defending them throughout this thread but if that's really what happened then that's sad.
The football score was 46-0, a fairly typical looking football blowout score. Not equivalent to a 73 point basketball win where you continue to pile up the points with the starters in the 4th quarter for 'payback'. That excuse doesn't really work for me.
How many teams blew them out in football?Payback from football.
Once again, you know it all because you read some numbers on the internet without attending the game or knowing the story!
were you at the game?...I'm curious as why would Hilmer put his starters back in? I have met Hilmer and I'm scratching my head over this one. It does start to look like all he is doing is helping his son pad his stats.
This wasn't the only game NL had starters in the game in the 4th when they were up 60+. The excuses that it was a 'rivalry' or 'you had to be there or you can't comment' are nonsense. It has happened other times this season. The reason this is a story is because coaches just don't do this very often - run up the score on an inferior opponent.
I've seen 500+ high school games over the past few decades (many blow-outs) and cannot recall a single one where a team won by 97 or the starters played when a team was up by 60 points.
You weren't in the stands!If you make the assumption that non-starters did not score at all in the first three quarters in any game this season (hard to believe and highly doubtful), then we know for sure that starters were playing (and scoring):
11/28 vs Marquette. Won 83-32. NL scored 26 pts in the 4th and non-starters scored a total of 19 pts in the game which means starters scored at least 7 in 4th.
12/5 vs Springville. Won 92-36. NL scored 22 pts in the 4th and non-starters scored a total of 11 pts in the game which means starters scored at least 11 in 4th.
1/5 vs Easton Valley. Won 95-58. NL scored 22 in 4th and non-starters scored a total of 17 in the game. Starters scored at least 5 in the 4th.
2/6 vs Alburnett. Won 106-33. NL scored 18 in the 4th and non-starters scored a total of 11 pts in the game. Starters scored at least 7 in the 4th.
Starters also played in the 4th in a win over Liberty but giving them a pass on that one because they were "only" ahead by 33 at the end of the 3rd. If you concede that non-starters probably scored in the first 3 quarters in some of their games this season, then the number of games where starters played in the 4th goes up.
No idea why their coach had them in, post season is next week. Maybe their kids need to start playing more than half a game. Maybe they had injuries? Maybe they had kids play too many quarters earlier in JV? I don't know. Neither do any of you but you are all so sure they are doing it to be disrespectful and pad stats. Lot of untruths out there from people just reading quikstats and drawing conclusions
Please name all those games you know for sure they had their starters in the 4th quarter.
Once again, you know it all because you read some numbers on the internet without attending the game or knowing the story!