Deflection. I’m trying to establish YOUR benchmark of the definition of abetting terrorism or acts of terrorism that we can both apply moving forward. If you can’t state whether the Mayor is culpable or not in abetting domestic terrorism, then you admit your definitions and views of terroristic actors “depends”, but you apparently won’t discuss it, as to show the veiled hypocrisy …..
You are calling the Babbitt “freak” a terrorist, and I have not argued against your point. Per my inquisition, you concur the arson and forced entry into a federal courthouse is likewise domestic terrorism
but you stop at proclaiming a Dem politician actively engaging with the terrorists as being culpable - why?? How can you purport to engage in such a topic, if you stop when the knife gets sharp