I get a chuckle about this every year. Folks.. this is about geographic representation and not about having the best 4 teams in the dome.
It would be impossible for the state to get the best 4 teams there. Why? Even if you could measure/determine who the best 4 teams are it would change on any given day. Hate to be the bearer of bad news but you are chasing something that does not exist.
Even if the teams were constant how would you measure them? Moore? Do you see who the computer is still picking as #2? Harlan. Not taking anything away from them and I greatly admire their comeback this year but they did go out in the first round by 23 point to an unranked team. How can you trust a ranking from a system that for whatever reason produce results like this?
Let geography play out and quit worrying about someone other than the 4 best teams being in the dome. As already stated.....there is no such thing as "The 4 best teams".
It would be impossible for the state to get the best 4 teams there. Why? Even if you could measure/determine who the best 4 teams are it would change on any given day. Hate to be the bearer of bad news but you are chasing something that does not exist.
Even if the teams were constant how would you measure them? Moore? Do you see who the computer is still picking as #2? Harlan. Not taking anything away from them and I greatly admire their comeback this year but they did go out in the first round by 23 point to an unranked team. How can you trust a ranking from a system that for whatever reason produce results like this?
Let geography play out and quit worrying about someone other than the 4 best teams being in the dome. As already stated.....there is no such thing as "The 4 best teams".