IHSAA Missed the Boat
More data is needed. That's what the Board of Control said is needed before any changes will be considered to the current (brutal) playoff system. The Board of Control has managed to cram 4 Playoff games into a 15 day span, normally 4 high school football games would be spread out over the course of 28 days. Why hasn't the Board of Control been collecting data prior to now? So by ignoring the obvious for the last 4 years and not looking at the data the Board of Control has potentially put some athletes at risk. To miss the boat means that one doesn't understand what is going on.
The Board of Control will have a difficult time in retroactively getting accurate data, and exactly what data will they be looking at? There is an old saying in statistics, "Garbage in_ Garbage out" I would recommend that they look at more than just the total number of injuries. To be honest with you I have to question if playing 4 games in 15 is actually more dangerous.
Is Football more physical than Hockey, or Rugby? Some would argue no. Heck a rugby team can play as many as 4 games in a weekend tournament, and get up and go to work on Monday morning. So as "Football guy" I would like to know if football truly is a more physically taxing sport than Hockey or Rugby, that it should be played only once a week, and why is 7 days the magic number? If Football is so physically demanding maybe there should be a 10 to 14 day rest period in between games.
I think most would agree that preparation for a football game plays a part in the one game a week, I think it is nice but necessary, I don' tknow. I also believe that logistics play a big part in how often Football is played. But is it really more dangerous?
We should already have this data! The Board of Control should have done this research before they made the decision to expand the playoff format that makes the teams that reach the Finals play 4 games in 15 days.
What if the data suggests that there is no increase risk for serious injury playing 4 games in two weeks, how could that change the way we watch football. Imagine if you will football every night of the week? Does it any better than that?
So let's get this ball rolling Board of Control! If the data (that you should have been collecting the last 4 years) suggests that football can be played more often than once a week then why not look at expanding the season to 16 games. Can you say Cha-Ching$$$
http://www.stalbertsportsfan.com
More data is needed. That's what the Board of Control said is needed before any changes will be considered to the current (brutal) playoff system. The Board of Control has managed to cram 4 Playoff games into a 15 day span, normally 4 high school football games would be spread out over the course of 28 days. Why hasn't the Board of Control been collecting data prior to now? So by ignoring the obvious for the last 4 years and not looking at the data the Board of Control has potentially put some athletes at risk. To miss the boat means that one doesn't understand what is going on.
The Board of Control will have a difficult time in retroactively getting accurate data, and exactly what data will they be looking at? There is an old saying in statistics, "Garbage in_ Garbage out" I would recommend that they look at more than just the total number of injuries. To be honest with you I have to question if playing 4 games in 15 is actually more dangerous.
Is Football more physical than Hockey, or Rugby? Some would argue no. Heck a rugby team can play as many as 4 games in a weekend tournament, and get up and go to work on Monday morning. So as "Football guy" I would like to know if football truly is a more physically taxing sport than Hockey or Rugby, that it should be played only once a week, and why is 7 days the magic number? If Football is so physically demanding maybe there should be a 10 to 14 day rest period in between games.
I think most would agree that preparation for a football game plays a part in the one game a week, I think it is nice but necessary, I don' tknow. I also believe that logistics play a big part in how often Football is played. But is it really more dangerous?
We should already have this data! The Board of Control should have done this research before they made the decision to expand the playoff format that makes the teams that reach the Finals play 4 games in 15 days.
What if the data suggests that there is no increase risk for serious injury playing 4 games in two weeks, how could that change the way we watch football. Imagine if you will football every night of the week? Does it any better than that?
So let's get this ball rolling Board of Control! If the data (that you should have been collecting the last 4 years) suggests that football can be played more often than once a week then why not look at expanding the season to 16 games. Can you say Cha-Ching$$$
http://www.stalbertsportsfan.com