You’re fvckin a right we will. Don’t give us your hullshit about least worst after the shitshow we witness daily. Fvck yourself.
Georgiaaaaaaa…. Ohhhh Georgiaaaaaa
- Thread starter David_Dennison
- Start date
I certainly will. Anyone that doesn't is conveying they like the direction the country has headed the last 4 years and want it to continue.
Last edited:
Can I clue you in...? What you're holding is not a serve, more like a blibit bag (3 lbs bag w/ 5 lbs of shyt in it). The unending barrage of LP crud doesn't change a single mind here. Not one. NOBODY has a doubt about your suffering from DJTsyndrome and what you would like to see happen... so just give it a rest.
You can't even admit that the DJT appointed SCOTUS's has absolutely held off drastic changes against conservatives (which you claim to be). Unless of course you disagree with their latest decisions.
Given a liberal court, we'd be screwed much worse than this blathering dementia patient and his word-salad whore have already put us.
Gator, he might be a goober fan but you should listen to him on this.
How did SCOTUS do here IYO?
SCOTUS Erodes Progress as Title IX Turns 50
The Supreme Court’s April decision in a health-care discrimination lawsuit will likely also cut off emotional damages schools pay to those who win Title IX lawsuits for sex harassment and discrimination, because schools’ obligations under Title IX are also based on their receiving federal...
"Likely" seems like an important word in this opinion piece. Not "definitely" or just plain "will". It "will likely". Seems worth jumping on.How did SCOTUS do here IYO?
SCOTUS Erodes Progress as Title IX Turns 50
The Supreme Court’s April decision in a health-care discrimination lawsuit will likely also cut off emotional damages schools pay to those who win Title IX lawsuits for sex harassment and discrimination, because schools’ obligations under Title IX are also based on their receiving federal...news.bloomberglaw.com
How about this retort... 'Bloomberg Law'... LOL!!!How did SCOTUS do here IYO?
SCOTUS Erodes Progress as Title IX Turns 50
The Supreme Court’s April decision in a health-care discrimination lawsuit will likely also cut off emotional damages schools pay to those who win Title IX lawsuits for sex harassment and discrimination, because schools’ obligations under Title IX are also based on their receiving federal...
>... look familiar?...
Stop dodging a simple question. Take a crack at it yourself.
It’s pretty quick to the point. The substance is on on the first page syllabus. Please elaborate on the ruling itself. Here is the actual ruling ( opinion) straight from SCOTUS.
Was this a Conservative ruling or not? Go ahead - name the Justices who voted in favor of the ruling.
Last edited:
Tell you what.. I’ll categorize each of them just for you as they continue to roll in.
( for the record- since none have gone to trial yet - they remain felony indictments)
And there in lies the primary problem with a politicized SC, their job is to ensure laws do not infringe on the constitution….. they should never be writing laws, run for congress if that’s your thing.
^^^ Gheytor using his JD here! Proud Graduate of the University of American Samoa! ^^^
Wait. Did you just tell someone to stop dodging the question? Ho. Li. Fuk. Lmaoooo
Saul made no bones about it. He was crooked and in it for the money.Yeah but I’d trust Jimmy…err Saul more than Gator
I’m destined for a Cinnabon shop in Omaha. I Miss that show.. source of all my legal prowess.
