And after a week or two, the computer will sift that out. Why do people get so high-strung about preseason polls or early season computer rankings?Originally posted by BlameIt:
I still see Wilton, Van Meter, Clayton Ridge, and West Marshall in the top 10.
MUCH MUCH too high.
Van Meter cannot compete with the better teams this year without Brandon Brittain. He was the straw that stirred the drink in VM.
Wilton lost pretty much its entire offensive production team, and an all-state OL.
Clayton Ridge lost an absolute ton of skill production, but does return a fair solid OL.
West Marshall lost Ferch. That's enough to drop out.
Computers do not take that stuff into the equation.
Makes sense. Thanks for clarification.Originally posted by bcmoore87:
> Any specific reasons for Mason City's relatively high ranking?
Analysis is based entirely on 2013. Model is trying to fit Mason City 20-30 points below Centennial, Dowling, Southeast Polk, and Waukee. Additionally, the model is trying to fit Mason City 40 points above Hoover.
So, in doing the statistical fit, Mason City may be overrated (especially if you believe Centennial, Dowling, SE Polk and Waukee could have named the score).
Interesting idea- has anyone tried to form an actual tradition rating? Like using ten years of data or twenty years? I know it would be a big project but it would be interesting to see.Originally posted by screwloose:
Look at the early season computer rankings(power scores) as that particular team's "tradition rating". Of course teams change from year to year. That's why the games are played and subsequent rankings/ratings move accordingly. Give it a little time.
Relocated?Originally posted by cidhawkeye:
Regina was close to dropping football in the 90's, like school board meeting dropping it. Good thing they relocated and became private.....