We will just have to disagree RC. If West Branch played Xavier they would be taken to the wood shed. So would any 1A team.
Xavier is on a different level than any other 1A team.
They aren't even often challenged by many 3A teams.
We will just have to disagree RC. If West Branch played Xavier they would be taken to the wood shed. So would any 1A team.
I would be in favor of something like a 50/30/20 weighting. Most important is what you win, second most is that you try to play a quality schedule. I'd also be in favor of having a game or two that don't factor into the RPI so you can have a rivalry game and not have it impact your RPI, that's good for your fan base, good for the sport.The D5 runner-up is in jeopardy of not making it at 8-1 or 7-2 due to soft non-district schedules they were dealt. Not sure if S-K or Mepo requested any of the teams they played, but it would good if the state was transparent in that. If the schools had no control then RPI shouldn’t be the determining factor or at least not the only factor for at-large spots.
The rest of the district being very weak in the non-district didn’t help either. Maybe the win/loss should be a higher portion than the opponents record. 50/30/20, 45/35/20 or something similar.
I think there's the possibility that any really good team on the right night with no mistakes could pull it off. Yes, Xavier is excellent, but they weren't undefeatable. A West Sioux kind of attack could give them problems, again, on the right night, with everything going right. And since I'm willing to entertain the notion of a West Sioux doing it, then I think it's only fair I include the others who could be contenders. Do I think WB would beat Xavier? No. Do I think it's 100% out of the realm of possibility? No. I could see any of the top 5-6 1As pulling off a 28-24 upset and I could see any of them falling 35-0. In the end they are all still HS kids. Xavier's size and depth just make it A LOT tougher.We will just have to disagree RC. If West Branch played Xavier they would be taken to the wood shed. So would any 1A team.
Agreed. This year's Xavier team is a shadow of their previous teams. That regina score, for example, is not even close to being indicative to how competitive that game actually was. Actually surprised how much they dropped off this year.I think there's the possibility that any really good team on the right night with no mistakes could pull it off. Yes, Xavier is excellent, but they weren't undefeatable. A West Sioux kind of attack could give them problems, again, on the right night, with everything going right. And since I'm willing to entertain the notion of a West Sioux doing it, then I think it's only fair I include the others who could be contenders. Do I think WB would beat Xavier? No. Do I think it's 100% out of the realm of possibility? No. I could see any of the top 5-6 1As pulling off a 28-24 upset and I could see any of them falling 35-0. In the end they are all still HS kids. Xavier's size and depth just make it A LOT tougher.
We will just have to disagree RC. If West Branch played Xavier they would be taken to the wood shed. So would any 1A team.
In sk’s defense, almost two years ago when they put teams they’d like to play for their non district games, it would’ve been very unlikely that all four of their teams they played, Pekin, Lynnville, Albia and EBF would all be having down years. 4 fairly solid programs that usually field decent teams.The D5 runner-up is in jeopardy of not making it at 8-1 or 7-2 due to soft non-district schedules they were dealt. Not sure if S-K or Mepo requested any of the teams they played, but it would good if the state was transparent in that. If the schools had no control then RPI shouldn’t be the determining factor or at least not the only factor for at-large spots.
The rest of the district being very weak in the non-district didn’t help either. Maybe the win/loss should be a higher portion than the opponents record. 50/30/20, 45/35/20 or something similar.
That was not the point I was making, RK.
I realize WB would lose to CRX.
The point being made was why are you calling out teams in favor if Regina, but then not listing the teams you referred to.
Stand behind your brand, man. I will believe your stance. That's the difference between me and others. If you say, "this is what went down (aka the truth)", who am I to tell you differently when I dont walk the road you travel?
2006 scenario
WB, Monte, Regina tied for district title each having one district loss.
WB beat Monte
Regina beat WB
Monte beat Regina
13 point rule used to decide the winner
Monte had best 13, then WB, then Regina
For runner up, it went back to head to head. Regina beat WB, so they were runner up
Never understood the reason for the 13 point rule. It should be used in all tiebreakers or not have it at all, was the contention of 8-1 WB and 8-1 2A Monticello in the same year.
SK had one of the best non district schedules in 1A last year? 2019 Same teams. You gonna start scheduling year by year or something