The way the governments treated Ivermectin alone should be enough to make any neutral party take a step back and ask wtf is going on?
I don't know how well it works and am largely neutral on the whole subject, but the way it was treated by the same people that were pushing Remdesivir, masks, etc. is enough to make me wonder about it.
The greatest irony was that the push for it was that is was very good as a prophylactic, and the greatest help from it was if it was given as soon as you discovered you were sick. So how was the first big RCT designed for it? Given to people that were already hospitalized/on their death bed, and it had minimal/no benefit to people already extremely sick. That was used to push that it didn't do anything and to ban it.