Hey - sorry I did not post sooner. Got logged out, forgot my password, etc..... took me a while to get back in.
I do the 1A boys rankings....... so, definitely feel free to send me some info, point out mistakes, make your case, etc.
In regard to some of the questions....
The reason the rankings (and 1A in particular) were slow to get going was two-fold. #1 - I was not sure if I was even needed to do a set of rankings this season or not. The person who oversees posting all the rankings was having some significant technology issues, so communication was slow to start. When I found out I was needed to do 1A, and the boys side of it, it happened to coincide with being crazy-busy at school...... So, it took me a few days to get something organized. And, yes, I took the state meet results, removed seniors, put in a couple kids I knew should fit in elsewhere (forgot to change grades) and posted them as they were...... as there really was not much in the way of meet results at that point, and I had only found out for sure that they needed me to help with 1A boys.
The way the rankings get done is that they need to find someone willing to volunteer their time to put them together and send them in. Generally not much of a line for the job. The entire thing is done by volunteers, and to be honest, it is kind of a PITA to try to rank 30 individuals. Top 10-15 are not that hard. After that, it starts to be a crapshoot to some extent.
My method is simple...... I try to find key meets, with head to head competition from each region. So, for example, something like the North Fayette meet or Starmont meet in NE brings in most of the kids in the region. I take those results and put the 1A kids in order...... So, say Ryan Izer from TValley is at "0" then put kids in at 2-4-6-8-10....... seconds back (as they finished behind him). I do this for 6-10 "bigger" meets, that involve as many regional 1A kids as I can find. This gives me a pretty good idea of the order and time spread for each region. I basically have 6-10 strips of paper that have an order of finish and are spaced out according to time. I then look for cross regional comparisons.. and start to match up the strips of paper...... think of something kind of like a slide-rule.
It really takes about 3-4 weeks of getting some decent results to get things ironed out...... 1A especially as there are just so many more schools, and they are so spread out, and waiting for some of those cross-regional head-to-head meets to happen simply takes time.
I also try to see multiple results before I move kids all over the place. I also take into account abnormally hot meets (that don't really give the best indication of where kids fall compared to each other). I take into account a kid having a bad meet and am not going to move kids 20 places in one direction or another based off of a single performance.
But, yeah, that is kind of how it goes. I know there are certainly some mistakes and areas that need to be moved around..... I think that will get a little better each week. Also, often it is hard to track down some of the 1A results in a timely fashion..... If I do the rankings on Tuesday, send them in, and then see results the next day..... or week..... that contradict what I posted..... it just has to wait till the next time around.
As I said, always looking for input. Specific is best....... List the winner of the race and his time, the 3-7 1A kids and their times. And, any inside info that is relevant..... "so-and-so was sick" or "it was 98 degrees" etc.