ADVERTISEMENT

Changes Announced for 2018

For Immediate Release-- October 25, 2017

Boone, IA --The Iowa High School Athletic Association’s Board of Control voted to approve recommendations to adjust classification sizes for the 2018 and 2019 football seasons at Wednesday’s monthly meeting in Boone.

Using recommendations made by the IHSAA’s Classification Committee last month, the Board unanimously agreed to decrease the current number of schools in Classes 4A, 3A, 2A, and 1A, and raise the enrollment cap for 8-Player programs.

“The classification committee comes in every other year and encompasses superintendents, principals and athletic directors from public and non-public schools along with schools with broad ranging enrollments. Their thoughtfulness and careful examination of the landscape of football in the state of Iowa lead to these recommendations,” said Todd Tharp, assistant director and football administrator for the IHSAA.

The changes will be implemented during the 2018-19 redistricting cycle. Based on six priorities established by the Classification Committee, class sizes are as follows: the top 42 schools according to the 2017-18 BEDS document will be in 4A, the next 54 schools in 3A, the next 54 schools in 2A, the next 54 schools in 1A, and the remainder of 11-player schools in A.

In the 2016-17 cycle, 4A had 48 schools and the planned sizes of 3A, 2A, and 1A included 56 schools.

The enrollment cap for schools to participate in 8-Player has been raised from 115 to 120 students, per the 2017-18 BEDS listing. There is still no minimum enrollment requirement for 11-player football.

These recommendations were made and approved with six priorities in mind, meant to benefit IHSAA football classifications for the next two years and in the future.

1. Improve competitive balance. The potential for more non-district games allows schools to schedule similarly competitive opponents.

2. Revitalize rivalry games.
An opportunity to play more non-class and non-district games means traditional rivalries between schools and communities may stay on the schedule.

3. Reduce non-district travel. Close proximity can increase attendance for home teams and limit travel expenses for road teams and their fans.

4. Potentially increase participation at all levels. More selective schedules may help slow the flow of underclassmen taking the field early in district contests, which can offer a safety and motivational benefit.

5. Trim enrollment gap in Class 4A. Addresses the trend of the state’s largest schools continuing to grow at faster rates than other districts.

6. Maintain six classes for at least two more years.
Changes were made to the classification structure, but five 11-player classes and one 8-player class will exist for another redistricting cycle.

The Board of Control agreed with the Classification Committee’s assessment that these adjustments would allow the IHSAA and their member schools to address their priorities before planning the next two football seasons, while also monitoring movement and interest at the A and 8-Player levels.

“These changes in classifications will allow schools to continue to evaluate their respective football programs and try and define what needs best fit their program,” Tharp said. “For some programs, the aspect of potentially playing more non-district opponents may lead to creating a more balanced schedule for them, potentially increasing student participation as schools, while others may attempt to challenge themselves with more competitive non-district games.”

The determination of districts per class and postseason qualifying methodology was not made by the Board or the Committee. The decision will be made in conjunction with the Iowa Football Coaches Association executive board, the Iowa High School Athletic Directors Association, and the IHSAA, with final recommendations coming from the football advisory committee after district football meetings are held.

“There will be opportunities to evaluate the number of districts and teams in a district,” Tharp said. “Obviously, with 54 teams in Classes 3A, 2A, and 1A, six-team districts will provide for a re-evaluation of the qualifying system and looking at other analytics to determine the qualification system.”

Also affected by the change to the 8-Player enrollment cap: Exceptions for schools attempting to classify for 8-Player football. The Board previously approved two exceptions for schools whose enrollments rose above 115 through the BEDS document. Only Exception No. 1 was kept through voting Wednesday, with the Classification Committee recommending its retention due to the cost of configuring football fields for the 8-Player game.

The first exception, as written: “An 8-Player football school whose current enrollment is 115 or less, and whose enrollment increases above 115 following the 2017 season, will be allowed 8-Player football status for an additional 2 years.”

---
Football’s postseason begins Friday, October 27, at 48 sites across the state of Iowa. Games in all six classifications are scheduled to kickoff at 7 p.m.

Four first round games can be viewed on the NFHS Network with an all-access viewing pass available for $9.99 per month. The games are: Lewis Central at Valley, West Des Moines; Cedar Falls vs. Prairie, Cedar Rapids at Wartburg College; Webster City at Pella; and Glenwood at Sergeant Bluff-Luton.

The Iowa High School Sports Network provides viewing opportunities of IHSAA championship events through NBC Sports Chicago, formerly known as Comcast SportsNet. IHSSN is now offering expanded options for semifinal and championship football games on multiple platforms, including: Sling TV (through a Sling Blue subscription), FuboTV, Playstation Vue, and Hulu, as well as its returning packages through DirecTV and DISH Network, and local cable subscribers around the state. Visit IHSSN.com for to select your best viewing options.

CONTACTS: IHSAA Assistant director Todd Tharp, ttharp@iahsaa.org; IHSAA Communications Director Chris Cuellar, ccuellar@iahsaa.org; IHSAA office: 515-432-2011.
 
Midland is currently over 115 and will be 124 so unless the Union changes their mind or they loose 3-4 kids before January they will have to move up for 2 years.

Sidney is currently at 138 and next, then down to 120, so will be going up.

The current rule books says teams over 115 must play 11 player. I assume they will just change the number so no option to play down if you'd rather.
 
The postings below were from Sev393 and your_master5 on the class A boards. I think it responded well to that post there and will here as well. Great topic by the way!

___________________________________________________________________________________________

The 115 number is not a hard and fast rule. The school needs to be below that to get down to 8man initially, but once they start playing 8man, there are a couple exceptions that can keep them in 8man. I copied those below from the IAHSAA football manual.

also heard that the number might go up to 125 next cycle to allow some more A schools to drop into 8man as a way to avoid issues with forfeits. The next question would then become does IAHSAA dissolve class A at some point and go to just 5 classes (4a-3a-2a-1a-8man), ~64 teams again per class, 32 team playoff again??


"The enrollment cap to participate in 8-player football is the BEDS Document Certified Enrollment in grades 9-11 of 115 or less.


The following exceptions were recommended by the Football Play-Off Committee and approved by the IHSAA Board of

Control.

FIRST EXCEPTION: An 8-player football school whose current enrollment is 115 or less, and whose enrollment increases

above 115 following the 2015 season, will be allowed 8-player football status for an additional 2 years.

SECOND EXCEPTION: If an 8-player football school’s enrollment is greater than 115 and the BEDS Document Certified

Enrollment grades 9-11 (projection) verifies the 8-player football school will have an enrollment of 115 or less during the 2-year

period following redistricting, a school will be allowed to continue as an 8-player football school."

9 Sev393, Oct 3, 2017

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Not sure how the state could make it a hard number. So the state would penalize Midland for being at 124 next year, but the following year they are back down to 113? I can't envision the state having a two year cycle and a hard number. The difference between 113 and 124 is one big class.

What would happen if it were reversed? What if Midland had 113 next year and 124 the following year? It just doesn't make sense to change fields back and forth if the school will be 8 man for the foreseeable future. Whether it is 115 or 120, these teams for the most part will have a hard time fielding an 11 man team.

29 your_master5, Oct 23, 2017
 
Don't know what you mean 115 isn't hard and fast, it had 2 exception one of which has been removed, now only one. Under 115 projections don't mean crap, your current BEDS come Jan 2018 over 115 you play class A.

SECOND EXCEPTION HAS BEEN REMOVED

"SECOND EXCEPTION: If an 8-player football school’s enrollment is greater than 115 and the BEDS Document Certified Enrollment grades 9-11 (projection) verifies the 8-player football school will have an enrollment of 115 or less during the 2-year"

Number 2 was removed, so say Midland is over 115 come January, and they will be over 120 for the next 2 years not sure how anyone should think they should be allowed to play 8 player.


FIRST EXCEPTION: An 8-player football school whose current enrollment is 115 or less, and whose enrollment increases above 115 following the 2015 season, will be allowed 8-player football status for an additional 2 years.

(sub 2017 for 2015,Midland is over 115 BEDS today)

Other classes are split by 1 student, why should 8 player be any different.

But I don't doubt they will change the RULES again before Jan, but as I read them today Midland and Sidney should be playing class A the next 2 years.

I don't make the rules, just read them and IMO Midland should be playing A next year.

The UNION could change the 115 to 120 and then Midland might slip under, but that's not the way it's written today.
 
Last edited:
Sidney will be back below in 2 year let them play 8-player again for 2 more years with 138 beds, then they will be back under.
 
Sidney will be back below in 2 year let them play 8-player again for 2 more years with 138 beds, then they will be back under.

I don't have a dog in the fight and I'm not sure if you are asking or stating a fact, but in my opinion Sidney should be allowed to play 8 man, even at 138 if they are projected to be 120 or under at some point during the two year cycle or football should re-district yearly like other sports when it comes to post season. Why punish a team for the big classes to fall in the 'wrong' year? The work that goes into switching field dimensions is a lot. It's not an overnight fix at a small school with little maintenance staff.

8 man is different than 11 man in football. There is no reason the same rules have to apply in all classes, as witnessed by playoff qualifying procedures. I think the two exceptions for 8 man were fair and would propose they keep them in place. It's not to give the team a competitive advantage. It provides continuity with the program at the youth levels on up. No point for state to make a team go up for two years when long term projections have them under the limit every single year from pre-k on up except for one year that sets back program consistency because a couple big classes were strung together.

Why not use a 4 year BEDs number versus three? Why not 8-11, as those will be the kids playing?
 
The difficulty is that to toggle back and fourth from 8 player to 11 has costs associated with it. It's not just a matter of throwing 3 more kids out there. You have to reconstruct your field. To have schools undergo those costs (x 2) due to a short term bubble in enrollment is not only unwarranted but punitive. In today's reality schools can be a few over the upper limit one year and 15 to 20 under the next. Reasonable heads need to prevail on this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: your_master5
With Sidney it has number increases due to actions taken by the State against a neighboring school district. Not due to a large class moving thru the system. When the State closed down Nishnabotna most of the students open enrolled into the district. And Hamburg signed an agreement to send their high school students to Sidney. While Hamburg kept their district as a K thru 8 system. Shenandoah should have shown more of an increase in numbers but that didn't happen. The students from a smaller district preferred to stay in a smaller district. So it was similar to a consolidation of schools. Their BEDS numbers will depend upon a lot of "Ifs". If they are to maintain the open enrollments from what now belongs to Shenandoah district. If Hamburg maintains it's status and agreements with the district.

This year the Girls Union moved the volleyball team to 2A. Up from their previous 1A class. But to be truthful I do not see them moving them to 11 man football. I really expect that they will get another 2 years to see where they stand after that. If they move up it would be more of a local decision to do so.
 
Sidney has 39 players, 45 last year, 43 the year before. This year they will lose 8 SRs. Midland 43, 43 last year, 36 the year before. This year they will lose 7 SRs. Why make an exemption for teams that have clearly have plenty of players to play 11 man. These teams aren't alone, but why not allow more of your kids an opportunity to play? If the state wants to keep freshman from playing against seniors they should split 8 man into 2 divisions or lower the number.
 
Team roster numbers are not practical to base any kind of decision on. There are small schools with big participation numbers and large schools with small participation numbers. By this logic there are much larger schools with rosters smaller than 43 so why not let them play 8 man too? In stead of punishing solid programs with good numbers why not address failing programs? BEDs numbers have little effect on success if the kids don't go out so how about we address the actual problem? Low participation rates by percentage of total students.
 
When you argue using field changes and the associated costs it doesn't have to be that way. Kingsley Pierson has been playing 8-man for several years and still hasn't reset the goal posts. Not sure how they work it for field goals but they must have a process.
 
Punishing solid programs? If they have consistent numbers around 40 a solid program would play 11 man. Those are teams going after low hanging fruit. I get it if there is one big class moving through skewing the numbers but that's not the case. Why make exceptions for teams that could be successful in 11 man. I would guess that's why they eliminated the 2nd exemption. If they had 20 kids out for football then they would have a need to play 8 man. As for cost, moving field goal posts is it? They use the same field they just paint lines in different places.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warriors dad
To establish a schools classification based on it's roster is not possible and in my opinion we've spent far too much time discussing this. Unlike Beds numbers athletic rosters are not set until literally the first day of practice. Attendance in school is required by law. Joining an athletic team is not. The athletic association would have almost no time to set schedules and determine districts for all the teams in the state if they have to start form scratch every year at the first day of practice. To reset districts and schedules every 2 years is necessary for stability in the process and prevent rampant movement back and forth which is another scheduling nightmare. What about a 2A school with no tradition having 27 kids on their roster? Based on this logic they should be eligible for 8 player ball. What about Don Bosco with 35 kids on their roster with BEDS numbers in the low 80's? Good teams are good because of participation and sure BEDS numbers are a factor but as shown above not necessary. Midland has been tossed around in this discussion on this board and the Class A board as well with what has proven to be bogus BEDS numbers because I looked them up. They have been below the 115 number for the last several years with this years number bubbling up to 118 which is within the guidelines as established by the state. Their roster numbers have been between the upper 20's to the lower 40's over that time (Quick Stats) so I am sure they will continue to bounce around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BTB138
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT