ADVERTISEMENT

Changes Announced for 2018

So which 6 teams currently in 4A will be getting the ax next year? I would assume 3 of it's most recent additions, CBLC, Western Dubuque, and Newton will be among them head back down to 3A.
 
For Immediate Release-- October 25, 2017

Boone, IA --The Iowa High School Athletic Association’s Board of Control voted to approve
recommendations to adjust classification sizes for the 2018 and 2019 football seasons at Wednesday’s monthly meeting in Boone.

Using recommendations made by the IHSAA’s Classification Committee last month, the Board unanimously agreed to decrease the current number of schools in Classes 4A, 3A, 2A, and 1A, and raise the enrollment cap for 8-Player programs.

“The classification committee comes in every other year and encompasses superintendents, principals and athletic directors from public and non-public schools along with schools with broad ranging enrollments. Their thoughtfulness and careful examination of the landscape of football in the state of Iowa lead to these recommendations,” said Todd Tharp, assistant director and football administrator for the IHSAA.

The changes will be implemented during the 2018-19 redistricting cycle. Based on six priorities established by the Classification Committee, class sizes are as follows: the top 42 schools according to the 2017-18 BEDS document will be in 4A, the next 54 schools in 3A, the next 54 schools in 2A, the next 54 schools in 1A, and the remainder of 11-player schools in A.

In the 2016-17 cycle, 4A had 48 schools and the planned sizes of 3A, 2A, and 1A included 56 schools.

The enrollment cap for schools to participate in 8-Player has been raised from 115 to 120 students, per the 2017-18 BEDS listing. There is still no minimum enrollment requirement for 11-player football.

These recommendations were made and approved with six priorities in mind, meant to benefit IHSAA football classifications for the next two years and in the future.

1. Improve competitive balance. The potential for more non-district games allows schools to schedule similarly competitive opponents.

2. Revitalize rivalry games.
An opportunity to play more non-class and non-district games means traditional rivalries between schools and communities may stay on the schedule.

3. Reduce non-district travel. Close proximity can increase attendance for home teams and limit travel expenses for road teams and their fans.

4. Potentially increase participation at all levels. More selective schedules may help slow the flow of underclassmen taking the field early in district contests, which can offer a safety and motivational benefit.

5. Trim enrollment gap in Class 4A. Addresses the trend of the state’s largest schools continuing to grow at faster rates than other districts.

6. Maintain six classes for at least two more years.
Changes were made to the classification structure, but five 11-player classes and one 8-player class will exist for another redistricting cycle.

The Board of Control agreed with the Classification Committee’s assessment that these adjustments would allow the IHSAA and their member schools to address their priorities before planning the next two football seasons, while also monitoring movement and interest at the A and 8-Player levels.

“These changes in classifications will allow schools to continue to evaluate their respective football programs and try and define what needs best fit their program,” Tharp said. “For some programs, the aspect of potentially playing more non-district opponents may lead to creating a more balanced schedule for them, potentially increasing student participation as schools, while others may attempt to challenge themselves with more competitive non-district games.”

The determination of districts per class and postseason qualifying methodology was not made by the Board or the Committee. The decision will be made in conjunction with the Iowa Football Coaches Association executive board, the Iowa High School Athletic Directors Association, and the IHSAA, with final recommendations coming from the football advisory committee after district football meetings are held.

“There will be opportunities to evaluate the number of districts and teams in a district,” Tharp said. “Obviously, with 54 teams in Classes 3A, 2A, and 1A, six-team districts will provide for a re-evaluation of the qualifying system and looking at other analytics to determine the qualification system.”

Also affected by the change to the 8-Player enrollment cap: Exceptions for schools attempting to classify for 8-Player football. The Board previously approved two exceptions for schools whose enrollments rose above 115 through the BEDS document. Only Exception No. 1 was kept through voting Wednesday, with the Classification Committee recommending its retention due to the cost of configuring football fields for the 8-Player game.

The first exception, as written: “An 8-Player football school whose current enrollment is 115 or less, and whose enrollment increases above 115 following the 2017 season, will be allowed 8-Player football status for an additional 2 years.”

---
Football’s postseason begins Friday, October 27, at 48 sites across the state of Iowa. Games in all six classifications are scheduled to kickoff at 7 p.m.

Four first round games can be viewed on the NFHS Network with an all-access viewing pass available for $9.99 per month. The games are: Lewis Central at Valley, West Des Moines; Cedar Falls vs. Prairie, Cedar Rapids at Wartburg College; Webster City at Pella; and Glenwood at Sergeant Bluff-Luton.

The Iowa High School Sports Network provides viewing opportunities of IHSAA championship events through NBC Sports Chicago, formerly known as Comcast SportsNet. IHSSN is now offering expanded options for semifinal and championship football games on multiple platforms, including: Sling TV (through a Sling Blue subscription), FuboTV, Playstation Vue, and Hulu, as well as its returning packages through DirecTV and DISH Network, and local cable subscribers around the state. Visit IHSSN.com for to select your best viewing options.

CONTACTS: IHSAA Assistant director Todd Tharp, ttharp@iahsaa.org; IHSAA Communications Director Chris Cuellar, ccuellar@iahsaa.org; IHSAA office: 515-432-2011.
 
Based on 2017-18 Beds Clinton in D7, Waterloo East D5, CBLC D3, EPW Dubuque D6, North Scott D6 and Newton D4 would move to 3A.
That would be correct. If there are 42 teams total and you keep 16 team playoffs, would there be 6, 7-school districts with 1&2 making playoffs and 2 "wildcard" teams out of the remaining 28?
 
That would be correct. If there are 42 teams total and you keep 16 team playoffs, would there be 6, 7-school districts with 1&2 making playoffs and 2 "wildcard" teams out of the remaining 28?

I think they are leaning towards six-team districts in 4A thru 1A, so 4A would have seven districts. So, yes, there would be 14 auto qualifiers and two wild cards.
 
I think most figure that IC Liberty will be above most of these schools, so you could assume that Mason City would probably be going down to 3A also with the six mentioned above. If they decide to go the route of seven-six team districts, you all know what time it is...it might look something like this...

District 1
Ankeny
Council Bluffs Lincoln
Des Moines Lincoln

Sioux City North
Sioux City West
West Des Moines Dowling

District 2
Ankeny Centennial
Council Bluffs Jefferson
Des Moines East
Des Moines North
Sioux
City East
Waukee


District 3
Des Moines Hoover
Des Moines Roosevelt
Indianola
Johnston
Urbandale
West Des Moines Valley


District 4
Ames
Cedar Falls
Fort Dodge
Marshalltown
Southeast Polk
Waterloo West


District 5
Cedar Rapids Jefferson
Davenport Central
Davenport West
Dubuque Hempstead
Iowa City West
Linn-Mar


District 6
Cedar Rapids Kennedy
Cedar Rapids Prairie
Dubuque Senior
Iowa City Liberty
Muscatine
Pleasant Valley


District 7
Bettendorf
Burlington
Cedar Rapids Washington
Davenport West
Iowa City High
Ottumwa


Obviously this is just thrown together quickly, adjustments could be made/switched. But it could stand as an outline, at least.
 
This wont increase player participation, I don not even see a increase of playing non district games in 4A.

By going to Six Districts with 7 Teams, you are almost back to Conference Play, that's a start. District Champs and then the rest on Points.

I can see
Wat West
Wat East
Cedar Falls
Mason City
Marshalltown
Ft Dodge
Ames

As a core of some kind of District
 
I think most figure that IC Liberty will be above most of these schools, so you could assume that Mason City would probably be going down to 3A also with the six mentioned above. If they decide to go the route of seven-six team districts, you all know what time it is...it might look something like this...

District 1
Ankeny
Council Bluffs Lincoln
Des Moines Lincoln

Sioux City North
Sioux City West
West Des Moines Dowling

District 2
Ankeny Centennial
Council Bluffs Jefferson
Des Moines East
Des Moines North
Sioux
City East
Waukee


District 3
Des Moines Hoover
Des Moines Roosevelt
Indianola
Johnston
Urbandale
West Des Moines Valley


District 4
Ames
Cedar Falls
Fort Dodge
Marshalltown
Southeast Polk
Waterloo West


District 5
Cedar Rapids Jefferson
Davenport Central
Davenport West
Dubuque Hempstead
Iowa City West
Linn-Mar


District 6
Cedar Rapids Kennedy
Cedar Rapids Prairie
Dubuque Senior
Iowa City Liberty
Muscatine
Pleasant Valley


District 7
Bettendorf
Burlington
Cedar Rapids Washington
Davenport West
Iowa City High
Ottumwa


Obviously this is just thrown together quickly, adjustments could be made/switched. But it could stand as an outline, at least.

Where do you put Wat. East?
 
I think geographically you are on the right path screwloose. I know you threw them together quick more based on geography than balance. I think you'll see D1, D2, D3 have those teams in it, but there'll be some shuffling. D1 is too weak top to bottom and D3 is too strong top to bottom as you have it now. D2 best follows the tier system, but to balance the other ones they'll need to pull from D2 in some fashion probably.
 
In the current district format, it's my understanding the IHSSA "reshuffles" the individual teams within the districts every two years. Other than keeping members somewhat geographically contiguous, how are they determining district composition? Obviously you don't want 4 powerhouse teams in the same district. However, one years contender can be next years patsy.
 
The problem with Waterloo East is that the school district hasn't changed the district boundaries in years. West has just about double the enrollment of East. If they made a slight adjustment to the boundaries, East would easily gain another 200 students easily.

Liberty could have a BEDS enrollment of something between 640-675. So they could possibly be at 3A for football next year. I think they currently have around 700 students with about 3 dozen seniors.
 
I agree with Franky, the changes aren't going to increase participation throughout the classes. That is dependent on socioeconomic conditions, demographics of the school, coaching quality, coaching stipends, facilities, off season conditioning/weight training and overall community attitudes toward their respective football programs. I don't see participation improving in 4A, especially from 32nd to 48th place currently in the Beds count. 3 of the teams moving down are current 4A playoff qualifiers this year plus an improving Newton and will all be a factor in 3A playoffs imo. It will create some interesting new schedules with everyone playing 4 non-district games and make it easier to set them up with the same size districts in all 11 player classes.
 
Last edited:
The problem with Waterloo East is that the school district hasn't changed the district boundaries in years. West has just about double the enrollment of East. If they made a slight adjustment to the boundaries, East would easily gain another 200 students easily.
.


Roughly 30 years to be precise. It's been that way since West essentially absorbed all of the kids that went to the now defunct Waterloo Central. The Waterloo community school district could definitely stand to realign their district boundries for East and West.
 
In the current district format, it's my understanding the IHSSA "reshuffles" the individual teams within the districts every two years. Other than keeping members somewhat geographically contiguous, how are they determining district composition? Obviously you don't want 4 powerhouse teams in the same district. However, one years contender can be next years patsy.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they use a tier system and I believe it is made up of 3 tiers. They look back over the last "X" number of years and then tier teams based on previous results. Each district is assigned 2 T1, 2 T2, 2 T3.

EDIT: The following is based on my assumption that they look at overall record.. if they only look at district record, my point below becomes inaccurate/moot, except the temporary imbalances due to new schools being created.

A few things can skew this a little bit. When schools split/are created it can create temporary imbalances. Teams that schedule a very tough, or very weak, non-district schedule might jump or drop a tier undeservedly. Urbandale (6-3) vs Newton (7-2) is a good example. Urbandale played Waukee (6-3), Johnston (8-1) and Dowling (8-1) plus Mason City (2-7). Newton played Ottumwa (0-9), Waterloo East (2-7), DM North (0-9) & Burlington (1-8, beat Ottumwa) like I said, they look at more than the previous 2 years, but if a team scheduled the way Newton did repeatedly, they could potentially work themselves into that Tier 1 category and may have never made the playoffs in that span. Meanwhile, Urbandale may have won their district repeatedly, but drops to Tier 2 because they've played such a tough non-district schedule.

Going to a points system, especially one like Nebraska where there are 4 levels, would help encourage at least 1 match-up with a middle/top tier team in non-district games and I believe would ultimately lead to a better representation of the true tiers. I do think they are fairly accurate right now, but over the long run there can be a misplaced team here and there based on how they had scheduled non-district games.
 
I think I read once, they go back ten years. But like you said, the new teams or teams moving up(like CB Lewis Central a few years back), they have to either prorate the numbers or tweak them up or down a bit.

On a side note, the tier thing is obviously in play. But so the geography plays a larger role. If you look at the districts I drew up quickly in the post above, I have Indianola in D3, with no teams from the old MRAC. This is because the IHSAA tries to keep Indianola from playing those schools. A similar exception has been made for Marshalltown and to a lesser degree, Southeast Polk. That's why D3 is considerably stronger looking than D1, the tiers were skewed. I suppose it could be a spot where Indianola was swapped with Ames.
 
I think most figure that IC Liberty will be above most of these schools, so you could assume that Mason City would probably be going down to 3A also with the six mentioned above. If they decide to go the route of seven-six team districts, you all know what time it is...it might look something like this...

District 1
Ankeny
Council Bluffs Lincoln
Des Moines Lincoln

Sioux City North
Sioux City West
West Des Moines Dowling

District 2
Ankeny Centennial
Council Bluffs Jefferson
Des Moines East
Des Moines North
Sioux
City East
Waukee


District 3
Des Moines Hoover
Des Moines Roosevelt
Indianola
Johnston
Urbandale
West Des Moines Valley


District 4
Ames
Cedar Falls
Fort Dodge
Marshalltown
Southeast Polk
Waterloo West


District 5
Cedar Rapids Jefferson
Davenport Central
Davenport West
Dubuque Hempstead
Iowa City West
Linn-Mar


District 6
Cedar Rapids Kennedy
Cedar Rapids Prairie
Dubuque Senior
Iowa City Liberty
Muscatine
Pleasant Valley


District 7
Bettendorf
Burlington
Cedar Rapids Washington
Davenport West
Iowa City High
Ottumwa


Obviously this is just thrown together quickly, adjustments could be made/switched. But it could stand as an outline, at least.

I really hope Dowling is in a tougher district than that.
 
Put Dowling, Valley, SE Polk and Ankeny Cent. In same district. That should give Dowling a better Challenge
 
Actually, Dowling scheduled Waukee, Ankeny, Valley and Urbandale this year, had Centennial (loss) in district play. They play that competition for rivalries (Valley), and to prepare for playoffs.
 
Actually, Dowling scheduled Waukee, Ankeny, Valley and Urbandale this year, had Centennial (loss) in district play. They play that competition for rivalries (Valley), and to prepare for playoffs.
Which is yet another of the reasons why DM metro area teams have a distinct advantage vs east/west "coast" IA teams, scheduling quality opponents with out having to travel for hours.
 
I think Valley and Dowling with another contender should be in a district. More so if they go to 7 Districts.

I'm not sure why IC West, IC High and Bettendorf could not be in the same District.

Look at Waterloo East, stuck in the same district with Waterloo West, Cedar Falls and always a strong team from Cedar Rapids.

Honestly why dont they put East and West in different districts.they could also move Cedar Falls to the West side as well
 
Prep football success starts with participation and experienced upperclassmen especially at the 4A level...there was an 0-9 4A team with just 11 seniors...there is no way a team is going to have success in that class with so few experienced players at the top of their squad with average athletic talent. I can't blame Newton for scheduling 4 terrible teams in their non district slate, it gave them the confidence to keep their players engaged during their 2 years back in 4A ball. I don't see how Iowa can maintain more then 24-32 4A teams with the difference in the suburban teams resources and the smaller 4A schools.
 
I look at Watetloo East, no soph team because they are all playing Varsity Football.

Two years from now I doubt that they will make the playoffs. They will return 10-15 starters next year, but so will many teams on their schedule.

They drop to 3a may get them to .500, they will still play West, Cedar Falls and most likely 2A Waterloo Columbus.

West is a big School and Cedar Falls is growing at a very fast rate, I just dont see East ever getting bigger to really compete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CF_93
Like I said the other day, I don't know why the city of Waterloo didn't restructure their school districts when Waterloo Central closed back in the 80's. They could easily have evenly distributed those kids between East and West, rather than send them all to West like they did. Never too late to do just that.
 
With current enrollment stats, your 5A would exclude Dowling and poor SC North is the lone west coast representative, they better have a good fuel supply.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT