5-10 years from now, will the IAHSAA add classes, remove classes, or leave it the exact same on the high school football field? What will they do? What should they do?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone has to be here asking questions. Getting too boring.Originally posted by Pinehawk:
It must be sweeps week. ;-)
What benefit is there for those schools/coaches? I mean, why would an AD at a school like, say Gilbert, want to vote to get rid of Class A? The more classes there are, the more watered down the field is for every class. I doubt there will be many schools lining up to make the competition tougher every year. There's not much benefit for most schools in doing so, and hurts more programs than it'll help, IMO.Originally posted by mtdew_fever:
The reality is that the IAHSAA doesn't control how many classes there are, but it's the coaches and AD's that do. My prediction is that in the next 5 years, there will be enough coaches/AD's vote to drop off Class A. Some of the schools will join 1A, while many will go down to 8-man.
That actually is a pretty solid counter point.Originally posted by tm3308:
What benefit is there for those schools/coaches? I mean, why would an AD at a school like, say Gilbert, want to vote to get rid of Class A? The more classes there are, the more watered down the field is for every class. I doubt there will be many schools lining up to make the competition tougher every year. There's not much benefit for most schools in doing so, and hurts more programs than it'll help, IMO.Originally posted by mtdew_fever:
The reality is that the IAHSAA doesn't control how many classes there are, but it's the coaches and AD's that do. My prediction is that in the next 5 years, there will be enough coaches/AD's vote to drop off Class A. Some of the schools will join 1A, while many will go down to 8-man.
In terms of the overall talent throughout the state, they should have probably cut Class A. But as you mentioned when breaking down $, they'll keep it. Hell, they may even add a 11-Man or 8-Man class. I'd say that is more probable than anything, regardless of what schools continue to disappear.Originally posted by tm3308:
I definitely don't see them letting all that money go away. That's 31 games in the playoffs. Say 800 total people showed up on average to those games (which I think is VERY conservative). That's just under $200k. That's not a number to sneeze at on its own, but I'm very confident that the actual number is much higher.
This post was edited on 8/5 10:12 PM by tm3308
Adding a second division in 8-man is by far the most likely change that we might see. I don't see a split in 4A; 2/3 of the teams already in 4A make the postseason because there are only 46 teams. Splitting that pie into even smaller pieces wouldn't work. But 8-man has serious potential to keep growing as enrollments decline in rural districts, so creating two divisions might make sense down the road a ways.Originally posted by DarkThunder#61:
I'll chime in here (...and I typed this before I saw all the new posts in this thread from today, fwiw).
I do think it's possible that we see another class added on, but it will most likely either come from the top, or in 8-man.
You look at both ends of the spectrum, starting in 4A. The talent gap is continuing to expand between some of the largest and smallest schools, but you also have the expanding communities like Ankeny splitting into a new school and Iowa City getting a new school, and there's talk of another new school going up in the Des Moines suburbs. I think it's possible if the suburb cities continue to grow and are in need of new school districts that 4A could break up as more larger schools form. With that said, this would be something that is MUCH further down the road than the 5-10 years Luke posted.
The other thing to consider is that many of the small schools are either consolidating (as Prairie Valley and Southeast Webster have done), or are dropping down to A and 8-man. There are 62 teams in Class A and 64 in 8-man.
If small schools continue to consolidate, this will make for fewer teams and thus make adding another class, at least at the lower levels unnecessary.
However, if 8-man becomes over-saturated with schools with declining enrollment, who either won't or can't consolidate but still want to field a sports team, then we could possibly see 8-man go to two different divisions. If, hypothetically speaking, 8-man ever grew to 80 teams, I think the State would strongly consider the option of two divisions for 8-man football (since it's a separate entity from 11-man anyways). Either that or they will encourage teams (if they can) to opt into a sharing agreement (which is probably something they'd do before they'd ever let 8-man grow to 80 teams....though there were 70 in 2012). I know Whiting, one of the programs that helped restart 8-man football in Iowa, is gonna be sharing with West Monona, at least for football.
So it's possible, yes, that we could see another class added, but not within the next 5-10 years unless enrollment for the smaller schools becomes a bigger issue AND enough schools drop to 8-man as opposed to consolidating or enter into sharing agreements (or choose to play 11-man, as some 8-man sized schools do).
This post was edited on 8/5 11:00 PM by DarkThunder#61
How do you feel about having to go that direction?Originally posted by paxregis:
The smallest school districts really won't have much of a choice but to consolidate. The Legislature phased out budget guarantees for school with declining enrollment and prohibits districts from running in the red, so it becomes very difficult to provide a comprehensive high school curriculum. Sharing a superintendent only saves about $60K. The cost savings of sharing higher-level math/science teachers with a neighboring district gets eaten up by transportation costs. Also, the legislature kept financial incentives for whole-grade sharing intact. So the school boards of these small districts, as much as they want to maintain their local high school, they increasingly see the writing on the wall and a new wave of consolidation is under way.
Originally posted by tm3308:
What benefit is there for those schools/coaches? I mean, why would an AD at a school like, say Gilbert, want to vote to get rid of Class A? The more classes there are, the more watered down the field is for every class. I doubt there will be many schools lining up to make the competition tougher every year. There's not much benefit for most schools in doing so, and hurts more programs than it'll help, IMO.Originally posted by mtdew_fever:
The reality is that the IAHSAA doesn't control how many classes there are, but it's the coaches and AD's that do. My prediction is that in the next 5 years, there will be enough coaches/AD's vote to drop off Class A. Some of the schools will join 1A, while many will go down to 8-man.
The school my kids attend currently shares sports with another districtOriginally posted by paxregis:
The smallest school districts really won't have much of a choice but to consolidate. The Legislature phased out budget guarantees for school with declining enrollment and prohibits districts from running in the red, so it becomes very difficult to provide a comprehensive high school curriculum. Sharing a superintendent only saves about $60K. The cost savings of sharing higher-level math/science teachers with a neighboring district gets eaten up by transportation costs. Also, the legislature kept financial incentives for whole-grade sharing intact. So the school boards of these small districts, as much as they want to maintain their local high school, they increasingly see the writing on the wall and a new wave of consolidation is under way.