Originally posted by ghost80:
It's easier to take your best players and leave them on the field than it is to develop greater skills in more kids and help take the load off the couple "studs" most 3A teams are going to have.
Class A, 1A and even sometimes 2A have to deal with low numbers which often requires a lot of 2 ways but even then it should be done smart and every option should be used to get those kids off the field as much as possible. Unless a history of excessive 2 waying has killed participation for a 3A school at that level it is more about a coaches philosophy of keeping the absolute best kid on the field at all times and accepting a gamble they won't get hurt.
Too often the coach gets cut both ways with the double edge sword of excessive 2 waying when he suddenly loses his "stud" who basically never leaves the field and plays O, D, and special teams plus he has no one with suitable experience to replace him in those multiple positions. Now he really has few options. Sometimes this can be a domino effect with other players getting injured due to the under experienced players being unable to effectively play the positions they weren't properly developed to play.
Carlisle has a history of playing few players and leaving their best athletes on the field too much. They also have a history of losing key players to injury. This might be a carry over of their days prior to them being a 3A school but they are now in a position they do have the numbers to avoid this situation.
Good programs will use their best guys in multiple roles... but they are smart about it and do it sparingly.
This post was edited on 11/1 7:12 AM by ghost80