The U.S. EEOC alleges that Sheetz has a practice of screening all applicants for records of criminal conviction and then denying them employment based on said record. The EEOC's charge claims that Sheetz disproportionally screened out applicants who are black, Native American and multiracial.
The lawsuit does not allege that Sheetz was motivated by race when making hiring decisions.
"Federal law mandates that employment practices causing a disparate impact because of race or other protected classifications must be shown by the employer to be necessary to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the particular jobs at issue,"
They want all minority applicants who were denied a job to:
A) be offered a job
B) receive lost back pay
C) gain the seniority they would have had if they had been hired
Seems reasonable...fvcking liberals have lost their freaking minds.
The lawsuit does not allege that Sheetz was motivated by race when making hiring decisions.
"Federal law mandates that employment practices causing a disparate impact because of race or other protected classifications must be shown by the employer to be necessary to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the particular jobs at issue,"
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sues Sheetz over alleged discriminatory hiring practices
The company's hiring practices allegedly screened out applicants who were black, Native American, and multiracial.
www.cbsnews.com
They want all minority applicants who were denied a job to:
A) be offered a job
B) receive lost back pay
C) gain the seniority they would have had if they had been hired
Seems reasonable...fvcking liberals have lost their freaking minds.