I swing both ways! I have a hybrid … but also a Mustang GT.
There’s a Tesla charging “station” in a parking area near a local grocery store and it’s amazing how many cars utilize it.
Joe Biden to Demand Half of U.S. Car Sales Be Zero Emission by 2030
President Joe Biden on Thursday will announce a target date of 2030 for all new car sales in the U.S. to meet zero-emission standards.www.breitbart.com
That would be hate speech! Got to avoid that kind of wrong speak
The climate is changing but it’s a natural geological orbital process. It happens every 50k yrs but no one kept records or had capability to spread panic-until recently. So everyone lived happily-now it’s a thing to manipulate politically.
Wow..not the response I would have expected. As for GW or “climate change” etc., I haven’t the slightest idea what may (or may not) be going on but God’s magnificent creation, earth, is an amazing thing to behold. We are called to be good stewards of her while here but more importantly towards each other. And the glaciers in IA, if y’all haven’t been here come on up and you’ll learn why…..The climate is changing but it’s a natural geological orbital process. It happens every 50k yrs but no one kept records or had capability to spread panic-until recently. So everyone lived happily-now it’s a thing to manipulate politically.
I’m a lot more concerned with contaminants, particulates and toxins. The carbon crap is a load of bullshit. Physical laws of conservation of energy /matter cannot be violated no matter what they call it. Combustion of any substance is going to release CO2 in order to release energy. It takes carbon produced ener to change the batteries. Ice will melt, Sea levels will rise, then it will reverse a we’ll have glaciers in Iowa.( hopefully
The only way to change that is to convert natural energy directly to energy- that leaves nuclear, geothermal, solar and wind. Hopefully there is some deregulation of commercial scale modular nukes… but it’s not likely to happen in my lifetime.
Nice to be on the same side of an issue for once, I'm with you on the air quality, etc. being a more pragmatic focus than carbon emissions. The problem, and we've sparred over alternative energy on this board before, is many of the "green" solutions have their own environmental issues or cost concerns. I like the nuke idea - and as discussed here most of the nuclear power plants in existence are old enough to start getting AARP mailers. Newer tech makes for a better and safer plant, but good luck getting people to see the forest for the trees.The climate is changing but it’s a natural geological orbital process. It happens every 50k yrs but no one kept records or had capability to spread panic-until recently. So everyone lived happily-now it’s a thing to manipulate politically.
I’m a lot more concerned with contaminants, particulates and toxins. The carbon crap is a load of bullshit. Physical laws of conservation of energy /matter cannot be violated no matter what they call it. Combustion of any substance is going to release CO2 in order to release energy. It takes carbon produced ener to change the batteries. Ice will melt, Sea levels will rise, then it will reverse a we’ll have glaciers in Iowa.( hopefully
The only way to change that is to convert natural energy directly to energy- that leaves nuclear, geothermal, solar and wind. Hopefully there is some deregulation of commercial scale modular nukes… but it’s not likely to happen in my lifetime.
The real measurable human problem with carbon fuel generation lies only in the air treatment and disposition of coal ash. It is the industry’s dirty little secret. Every year of operation produces about a ton each of mercury and chromium .
www.scientificamerican.com
