Originally posted by ronsss:
i thought harlan would beat denison, but not by the score they did...i have not read the stats of the game but dension had a huge offensive line against a much smaller harlan defense..also, harlan has 3 sophs playing, and some out with injurys yet,, i was sort of stunned by the score...got to give coach bladt some credit, he seems to come through wth a competitve team every year.
This post was edited on 8/31 12:52 AM by ronsss
Actually, Denison had about 140 yards or so on 2 drives in the second half. They also punted on 6 of their drives. I would say 3 fumbles were forced by Harlan and not Denison just putting the ball on the ground with fumbles 1 and 2 from very hard hits. Harlan's defense did a pretty good job with them most of the night except for those 2 drives. A few of Harlans scoring drives started from about the 50, Dension's 40, their own 40 so it is what it is.Originally posted by ronsss:
harlan was actually outplayed by 133 yrds by denison, denison had 7 fumbles that cost them the game...it still looks as harlan will have a tough year....sometimes the score does not reflect what actually happen in the game...
Actually the score was indicative of the outcome. Harlan was in complete control except for the two drives early in the second half that oonfoofoo is referring to. If you are going to turn it over then don't let them go 60 yards twice to score two TDs and a field goal.Originally posted by ronsss:
harlan was actually outplayed by 133 yrds by denison, denison had 7 fumbles that cost them the game...it still looks as harlan will have a tough year....sometimes the score does not reflect what actually happen in the game...