ADVERTISEMENT

So Peter Navarro did the Trumpsky perp walk today

David_Dennison

All District
Jul 13, 2020
6,186
1,825
113
Defiant MF Got fitted for orange jumpsuit and bracelets!! What is that 13 of his staff earned criminal indictments . but this is the dumbest MF in all the Cult … basically paints himself as the coach of the Green Bay Sweep… assisted by 100 congressmen. Then he claims executive privilege - even though is was removed . Trumpsky throws another under the bus.

he is going down first. Nothing like confessing on nation TV.

 
Last edited:
Lmao Trump’s balls have to taste kind of stale to you by now.

so do you ( or anyone else here) agree that his recorded admission on national TV pretty much covered each essential element of 18 USC 1505? If not - what did he miss?

What’s even worse is he made it a conspiracy by stating that they had “100 Congressmen ready to execute the sweep”. So now he exposed his cell phone and email records to find the other conspirators.
Do you think this is all OK? If so - it will be OK for Kamala to invalidate the next electoral count on the basis of fraud or voter suppression etc. you can’t have it both ways .


1725. PROTECTION OF GOVERNMENT PROCESSES -- OBSTRUCTION OF PENDING PROCEEDING -- 18 U.S.C. 1505​

Section 1505 of Title 18, United States Code, as amended by the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, forbids anyone from corruptly, or by threats of force or by any threatening communication, influencing, obstructing, or impeding any pending proceeding before a department or agency of the United States, or Congress. In 1996 Congress enacted a clarifying amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 1515, which defines the term "corruptly" as used in section 1505 to mean "acting with an improper purpose, personally or by influencing another, including making a false or misleading statement, or withholding, concealing, altering, or destroying a document or other information." False Statements Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-292, §3, 110 Stat. 3459, 3460.
Section 1505 also specifically prohibits anyone from withholding, misrepresenting, removing from any place, concealing, covering up, destroying, mutilating, altering, or by other means falsifying any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony that is the subject of a proper investigative demand under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1311-14, with the intent of avoiding, evading, preventing, or obstructing compliance, in whole or in part, with that demand.
 
Wait till DeSantis really kicks it into gear. It will give them a new flavor.
This isn’t about politics- is it a violation of Federal Law or no?

Required response :
If DeSantis ( or Trumpsky) wins do you think that he supports enforcement of this law ?
 
Are attempted crimes prosecuted usually? Yes or no will do.

1. That isn't a yes or no question. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Conspiracy...yes. Harassment, DUI, Domestic Violence, ect...no.

2. You moved the goalposts. You asked if it would be OK if Kamala invalidated the election. I merely stated that the election wasn't invalidated. The answer would be no either way but since the last election wasn't invalidated, I'll say capital NO if it makes you feel better.
 
1. That isn't a yes or no question. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Conspiracy...yes. Harassment, DUI, Domestic Violence, ect...no.

2. You moved the goalposts. You asked if it would be OK if Kamala invalidated the election. I merely stated that the election wasn't invalidated. The answer would be no either way but since the last election wasn't invalidated, I'll say capital NO if it makes you feel better.
Simple as it gets, but people with end-stage TDS don’t understand truth.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT