ADVERTISEMENT

Right now, how do you feel about the association controlling the pairings?

I don't mind that there's more leeway for 1st rd matchups. Plus there's one less thing for people to complain about now that they set a specific distance restriction. Of course they kinda skimmed over that when they paired D-NH and Bellevue.

The only issue is that the state can set themselves up for problems when potential situations like the one with central Decatur arises. Had CD gotten the 4 seed it would have caused a chain reaction for most other teams 1st rd opponents and basically it would've eliminated the point of the new rules.
 
Originally posted by DarkThunder#61:
Of course they kinda skimmed over that when they paired D-NH and Bellevue.

oh boy, a whole 1 mile over the 125 limit.

Pretty sure we can overlook 1 little bitty mile.

Correction, YOU can't but the rest of us are not going to complain about it.

No way you make Bellevue play NC in round of 32 over one mile.
 
I don't really mind it! The one thing I would like to see is teams that
don't finish over 500 overall on the season should not make the
playoffs. I know they may have a tough non district schedule or tough
district but to have 2,3, even 4 win teams in instead of some 5 win
teams seems somewhat wrong. It may be mean some districts don't get the
same amount of teams but to me you should have to have a winning record.
It is the postseason for a reason and I think you need to earn it (Good
Life Lesson). May mean odd number of teams but then reward the teams
that go undefeated and so forth. It could be done! I also think it
should be the same in all other sports as well such as basketball and
baseball. I know the one thing that people in Boone would say is that
will lower ticket sales but if you are putting the better and best teams
in you would think you would get bigger crowds and gather more
interest. Just my thoughts.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT