Release the Kraken...
- Thread starter derek_tiger
- Start date
I won't eat outdoors without a sidearm and multiple clips for the next few months.
I promise you I would have thrown my plates at them frisbee style had I been there....
I'm glad that one guy tried to make the megaphone guy eat it.
The party of decency and “unity” will burn down every major city in this country if is proven that their side cheated.
As for the article, I’ll believe it when I see it.
As for the article, I’ll believe it when I see it.
Do they really have something? Or is this just theatrics?
I’m getting to the point where I need to start seeing some real evidence, or these people need to stfu and swallow their loss.
I’m getting to the point where I need to start seeing some real evidence, or these people need to stfu and swallow their loss.
I'm in agreement with your line of thinking... Then... I think... there is NO way I'm making these comments as an atty w/o being able to back them up (unless I just don't GAS about my reputation).
I’m with you. The problem with so many things recently? There are so many “alternate facts” distorting reality and diluting the truth, it’s difficult to know what to believe anymore. From covid to elections, it’s a shitshow.
Here’s what I do know - if there is proof we need to see it soon or our entire government will be at risk. Proving there were “rigged” counts is bad enough. A protracted debate over the outcome helps nobody, except for maybe the marxists that want to burn it all down.
Fvck any cheating in an election like ours. Fvck anybody that supports it, regardless of their affiliation. In short, fvck the democratic party and their support groups.
They don’t owe showing any of us shit. Actually I don’t think that’s even possible and may be a violation of the law, but I’m no attorney. IDGAF what one single person in the news has said about showing proof now, and these assholes pepper every newscast with comments of false and unsubstantiated claims. Fvck off, assholes.
They want a revolution? They might get a response they don't like.
She says this problem with Dominion has been going on for years. So was it a problem in 2016 or was that OK because trump won?
If it is/was a problem, expose it. Do you have an issue with it?
WGAF...if it was a problem, it needs to be exposed. All of it, regardless of who it benefited. I cannot for the life of me understand how any American could feel differently.
In this instance, with these stakes, I do think that they owe the American public proof and/or answers.
If it is a problem I have no issue with exposing it. She said it has been going on for years but all the patriots have suddenly become aware of it just now.
That doesn’t mean that patriots, and certainly not a large number of patriots, knew that it was happening for years if she's correct.
You can learn something in this instant that may have been true for years. You get that, right?
Should be fun to watch.... the delay is on purpose. Could be a bunch of crap or could be so the democrats have less time to react.
Last edited:
Times ticking away. The courts have until December 8th...maybe you could stretch that until January 20th. After that, what in the entire fvck...
LAPTOP FROM HELLLLLLLLL!!!! LOLOLOL
seriously... dudes... Where’s the Chinese emails and child porn. Haven’t you people learned your lesson????
The CEO of Dominion was LOLing on an interview. Said they look forward to embarrassing this cvnt in court with some astounding facts about the data nationwide as it compares to manual recounts and random rechecks . Bring it on and keep feeding legal defense $$ to Trumpsky and Spastic Rudy.
Just so we are on the same page, Gator, the undeniable leader of the tinfoil hat brigade, has said that there is fraud in every election. I have said that I want any and all fraud exposed, regardless of who it helped. Cheating is cheating, and unlike college football, I do give a shit if you cheat to win an election.
I find your mocking the lawsuits (to determine fraudulent activity) interesting, curious, and contradictory to your past comments.
Why aren't you curious to see what this activity might be? I know it's difficult not to gloat when you think you are on the right side, but if it is determined that there was clear fraud early a.m. Nov 4th (when DJT had massive leads that vanished like a gator in the wind), will you be on the side of truth and honor? Or, will your DJTHate take over and the real gator will come out?
I know what I bet on... 🤔
Horesh@t not sticking as been going on since before the OrangeMan inauguration and continues relentlessly into today. You can bet a Biden investigation will go on forever and Jill will probably have to tell him daily that he and family are under investigation because dementia Joe really cant remember the last time he peed in his depends garment. Sleepy will sway with the wind and be easier to manipulate than a toddler that wants some candy.
The demoturds will cry!!! "Why the 24x7 investigation into Biden even before he was inaugurated!!!!"
Oh, the hypocritical irony.... wait for it.
Dershowitz: ‘Biden Is Not the President Elect’
Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said that Joe Biden is not the president elect but is entitled to describe himself as such.
“The president elect doesn’t get named as president elect until at least he has 270 state certification of electors, or his opponent concedes. Neither of that has happened as of now,” the high-profile lawyer told NTD News.
He added: “I think that he is entitled to describe himself as the president elect. At the moment he’s won 305 or so electoral votes and President Trump is entitled to dispute that. That’s freedom of speech. That’s politics. Neither is entitled as a matter of law or constitutionality to say that they are the president elect.”
Dershowitz, who served on Trump’s legal team during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said he believes the Trump legal team is seeking to have the election forced into the House of Representatives, by not letting Biden reach the 270 electoral college votes required to secure the presidency. Republicans have a 26-23-1 state delegation majority in the House of Representatives.
One possible way the Trump campaign can legally get electors to not vote is that if the challenges in court haven’t been resolved, some state secretaries of state, many of whom are Republican, may refuse to certify the vote by mid-December, Dershowitz said.
“That will be challenged in court. And that will be a mess, it would create a constitutional crisis of a kind we haven’t had before,” he said.
He noted that Trump’s lawyers are counting on a constitutional provision that moves the election to the House of Representatives if there is no definitive winner in the Electoral College by mid-December.
“I understand why the Trump legal team is trying to have the the election thrown into the House of Representatives. That’s their constitutional right. And I can’t condemn them for using every possible legal recourse. That’s what lawyers do.”
“I have no criticism of the Trump team for fighting and battling and trying everything they can legally, ethically, constitutionally, politically, to try to preserve his presidency,” he later added.
Dershowitz: Trump May Seek to Deny Biden 270 Electoral Votes, Put Election in Congress
Trump’s campaign or legal team haven’t publicly described what specific kind of strategy they are employing. Broadly speaking, there are two kinds of lawsuits that have been filed by the Trump campaign in several states, including at least one that is slated to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to Dershowitz.
“One I call the kind of wholesale constitutional lawsuits, like in Pennsylvania, where they’re challenging legally, whether all the votes that came in after Election Day have to be discounted, even if they were voted, even if they were submitted before Election Day,” he said. “That’s a constitutional challenge based on Article Two of the Constitution. It’s wholesale and involves many, many thousands of votes. And that has a good chance of succeeding.”
“The other challenges are retail challenges. They are case by case in a few people who shouldn’t have been eligible to vote, vote. Was there fraud? Was there a computer glitch? Those are much harder, because those require actual trials, witnesses evidence, and they will take time, and it will be very hard for them to succeed,” he said.
He said he is aware that Trump’s lawyers have spoken about potential computer anomalies that, if they turn out to be true, could trigger a “major disruption and shift.”
“We’ve never had anything like this before, because we’ve never had computers play such a major role in the election … The big challenge is whether or not there were computer malfunctions that turned many, many thousands of votes away from Trump and toward Biden, if that turned out to be true. And again, I haven’t seen the evidence. I’ve just heard the lawyers talk about it. That would change a lot of things.”
“And, of course, the American public would be very upset because they’ve been told by the networks who the winner is already. Remember that the networks don’t declare the winner, legally and constitutionally.”
NTD News reporter Christina Kim contributed to this report.
Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said that Joe Biden is not the president elect but is entitled to describe himself as such.
“The president elect doesn’t get named as president elect until at least he has 270 state certification of electors, or his opponent concedes. Neither of that has happened as of now,” the high-profile lawyer told NTD News.
He added: “I think that he is entitled to describe himself as the president elect. At the moment he’s won 305 or so electoral votes and President Trump is entitled to dispute that. That’s freedom of speech. That’s politics. Neither is entitled as a matter of law or constitutionality to say that they are the president elect.”
Dershowitz, who served on Trump’s legal team during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said he believes the Trump legal team is seeking to have the election forced into the House of Representatives, by not letting Biden reach the 270 electoral college votes required to secure the presidency. Republicans have a 26-23-1 state delegation majority in the House of Representatives.
One possible way the Trump campaign can legally get electors to not vote is that if the challenges in court haven’t been resolved, some state secretaries of state, many of whom are Republican, may refuse to certify the vote by mid-December, Dershowitz said.
“That will be challenged in court. And that will be a mess, it would create a constitutional crisis of a kind we haven’t had before,” he said.
He noted that Trump’s lawyers are counting on a constitutional provision that moves the election to the House of Representatives if there is no definitive winner in the Electoral College by mid-December.
“I understand why the Trump legal team is trying to have the the election thrown into the House of Representatives. That’s their constitutional right. And I can’t condemn them for using every possible legal recourse. That’s what lawyers do.”
“I have no criticism of the Trump team for fighting and battling and trying everything they can legally, ethically, constitutionally, politically, to try to preserve his presidency,” he later added.
Dershowitz: Trump May Seek to Deny Biden 270 Electoral Votes, Put Election in Congress
Trump’s campaign or legal team haven’t publicly described what specific kind of strategy they are employing. Broadly speaking, there are two kinds of lawsuits that have been filed by the Trump campaign in several states, including at least one that is slated to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to Dershowitz.
“One I call the kind of wholesale constitutional lawsuits, like in Pennsylvania, where they’re challenging legally, whether all the votes that came in after Election Day have to be discounted, even if they were voted, even if they were submitted before Election Day,” he said. “That’s a constitutional challenge based on Article Two of the Constitution. It’s wholesale and involves many, many thousands of votes. And that has a good chance of succeeding.”
“The other challenges are retail challenges. They are case by case in a few people who shouldn’t have been eligible to vote, vote. Was there fraud? Was there a computer glitch? Those are much harder, because those require actual trials, witnesses evidence, and they will take time, and it will be very hard for them to succeed,” he said.
He said he is aware that Trump’s lawyers have spoken about potential computer anomalies that, if they turn out to be true, could trigger a “major disruption and shift.”
“We’ve never had anything like this before, because we’ve never had computers play such a major role in the election … The big challenge is whether or not there were computer malfunctions that turned many, many thousands of votes away from Trump and toward Biden, if that turned out to be true. And again, I haven’t seen the evidence. I’ve just heard the lawyers talk about it. That would change a lot of things.”
“And, of course, the American public would be very upset because they’ve been told by the networks who the winner is already. Remember that the networks don’t declare the winner, legally and constitutionally.”
NTD News reporter Christina Kim contributed to this report.
Only demoturds like Hillary, Al Gore, etc.. can bitch about election results. Anybody else that disputes anything a demoturd does not want disputed should be denied jobs and removed from society... it is just that simple. Blacklist and try to shame those that do not agree with your fvcked up agenda. Get the fvck out of their way or they will burn down your city, home and indict you if you have a gun trying to defend your property and your rights. Welcome to the new USA.
Why hasn't the media gone after Sydney Powell yet? Isn't that standard M.O. for Dems & the Lincoln Project (one & the same)? Is there a reason they haven't discredited her yet?
Konigs knows what you’re talking about. Problem is he’s a liberal phag and doesn’t “want” it to be true.
Dershowitz need to go back to Epstein’s island and get him some child poon and chill out. Should take Trumpsky for a return trip.
Alan Dershowitz defends himself after name surfaces in Maxwell, Epstein documents
Attorney Alan Dershowitz defended himself from sex abuse claims Friday after his name appeared in a slew of unsealed documents related to a since-settled defamation case involving Ghislaine Maxwell…
nypost.com
Is the Kraken released yet?? ... maybe he’s busy enjoying the Chinese child porn on Rudy’s laptop from HELLLLLLLLL!!
LOLOLOL at you and your clown buffoon spastic Rudy. That video of his press conference at the landscape shop is just delicious.
maybe your most delusional post since Patrick fkn Queen being better than NC MVP “nicklehead “Biiiiig Jake Coker.
Similar threads
