ADVERTISEMENT

Post-Week 4 4A Playoff Pairings5

screwloose

Varsity
Sep 27, 2002
2,146
59
48
Back to do this another time.

AUTOMATICS(District Leaders, tiebreakers by record then RPI)...
D1: West Des Moines Dowling, 3-2(#13)
D2: Ankeny Centennial, 5-0(#1)
D3: Cedar Falls, 5-0(#2)
D4: Iowa City West, 4-1(#6)
D5: Bettendorf, 4-1(#8)
D6: Indianola, 5-0(#3)
D7: West Des Moines Valley, 5-0(#4)

WILD CARDS(Exclusively from RPI Rankings)...
Fort Dodge, 4-1(#5)
Johnston, 4-1(#7)
Muscatine, 4-1(#9)
Cedar Rapids Prairie, 4-1(#10)
Davenport North, 4-1(#11)
Waukee, 3-2(#12)
Ames, 3-2(#14)
Urbandale, 3-2(#15)
Cedar Rapids Kennedy, 3-2(#16)

FIRST ROUND(Reseeding after each round)...
Urbandale @ Ankeny Centennial
Cedar Rapids Kennedy @ Cedar Falls
Ames @ Indianola
Waukee @ West Des Moines Valley
Muscatine @ Iowa City West
Davenport North @ Bettendorf
Cedar Rapids Prairie @ West Des Moines Dowling
Johnston @ Fort Dodge
 
A couple of line bumps for geography, and you wouldn't even have to reseed.

(1*) Centennial vs (15) Urbandale
(13*) Dowling vs (7) Johnston

(4*) Valley vs (12) Waukee
(5) Fort Dodge vs (10) CR Prairie

(3*) Indianola vs (14) Ames
(6*) IC West vs (11) Davenport North -- district rematch, but DN would be #3 from that district

(2*) Cedar Falls vs (16) CR Kennedy
(8*) Bettendorf vs (9) Muscatine
 
I still need clarification on the Playoffs? I know the Iahsaa is using RPI to rank teams. What I am not sure about is if they are going to use any geographical bias towards first round playoff teams? OR is at the end of the year it will be seeded by RPI and then #1 play #16, #2 plays #15, ....and so on? Then reseed again after each round, correct?
 
Don't think they're going to straight seed it. They'll use geography, but it'll be loosely done. Example, if #1 is more than 125 miles from #16, but #15 is...then #1 will likely play #15 instead. The state will try to avoid district rematches also.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT