don't know him...
I do in general have a problem with the idea that because someone learned from so and so they're the choice.
Now, if you told me that he can reach kids, on and off the field and be the kind of leader / mentor that they need and build those relationships with them and in the community, etc... then fine.
But to me, just because you were an assistant coach or learned from someone or on a great staff should not make you the clear cut choice. That to me, should be reserved for the best guy for the kids/players.
Now, if its one and the same, great. Like I said, I don't know him, so am not trying to cast doubt on him or what he can or can't do. Just saying. I think more "should" go into a hiring than whether or not he's learned from someone or is from the area, etc. Those are nice, but to me, they'd be second place. I'd like someone I felt was going to help the young men (or women) on and off the field first. Be it a 20 year coaching vet or some 1st year rookie.