Originally posted by UnionFootballFan:
Originally posted by SPOONER:
Originally posted by Bringit10:
Keep in mind that their win against NFV took 7 or 8 turnovers from NFV. Minus the TO's, NFV controlled most of that game.
Also, though Union has a lot of wins they have a pillow soft schedule. If they had a schedule like New Hampton they would have at least 3 losses already.
As a Union fan I've been watching CPU's performance and trying to figure out what that means for us. Is CPU really not that good, are they a victim of a very tough district/schedule, was Union's performance against CPU a result of so many inexperience sophomores starting in key roles and have they gotten better since, is D3 even weaker than I already thought, etc.?
Ultimately SOS is huge. According to BCMoore, Union's SOS is ranked 26th to-date. Not necessarily pillow soft, but when you compare that to D3 teams it is definitely softer. CPU's SOS ranks 4th, New Hampton's SOS ranks 16th, NFV's SOS ranks 6th, Beckman's SOS ranks 14th. That is one tough district.
When you look at CPU, they are very one dimensional. I would argue that they started the season strong but haven't really improved (at least to the degree of other teams). There is a blueprint established for a gameplan to shutdown the CPU run game and teams can now more easily follow it. I think if CPU replayed games from earlier this season like NFV and maybe even Union, the outcomes would likely be different.