Originally posted by DarkThunder#61:
Originally posted by maxstabs13:
A non-partisan opinion...
IKM-Manning is better than people think. With wins over LV East Sac, Audubon, and Avoca by 21, 26, and 33 points all have 6-2 records... Other losses coming to Clarinda(7-1 2A), Logan Magnolia(8-0 A), Audubon beat Avoca 13-6...
Notable wins that we can somewhat get a feel for IKM-Manning as a result...
LV East Sac beat South Central Calhoun 14-12... SCC played to a 16 point loss versus FDSE and Madrid... Now my hunch is FDSE underperformed against SCC, but it may not be the case. Assuming LVES is 2 points better than SCC that would mean based on the 21 point win for IKM over LVES would make them 23 better than SCC. Making IKM 7 points better than FDSE or Madrid.
Again this is all statistical comparison which is different depending on team strengths and such... I would say BCMoore rankings are pretty accurate with IKM-Manning position at this point. I think ICR and SW have proven themselves as legit #1 and #2 thus far. I believe we are still unsure of the legitimacy of WB, IKM-M, and FDSE due to opponents they have faced with solid records having not done it against the most desirable competition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lisbon is the connecting point in comparison of SW and WB... It is hard to tell because some teams get whooped up on and the better team pulls back the reigns...
Without getting overly wordy you can look at teams and mainly look at the 3A-A rankings on BCMoore to get the best idea of how teams from other classes would rank in your class. Lisbon would be in the #25-35 range if playing 1A. I think that record speaks a little to highly of them. I would view them as a 2-3 win district team if playing in the WB district. They would lose to NC, Alburnett, WB, Bellevue and have decent games with Wilton and Durant and whoop Wapello.
Anamosa has been squeaking past questionable to bad teams all season and somehow beat LPC last week. They are getting smoked by Cascade, so that win for NC isn't nearly as good as it would seem and outside that win NC doesn't have a respectable win, but a decent game with WB. Yes, Bellevue is decent and smoked Alburnett but no other team they have beat is even close to good and the best being 2-6 Durant they beat by 8 points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My reason for not feeling FDSE can be considered legit...
They squeaked past Garrigan 14-7 who is a very solid team with two losses... (just wanted to quickly remind you that SE beat Garrigan, 14-9 and trailed Newman at one point before going on to play in the championship last year.....) The other loss to 7-1 Nashua Plainfield by 8, which is also a solid team. Nashua though lost by 13 to St. Ansgar who is 8-0 and beat Denver by 8 and West Hancock by 1... Denver lost 43-0 to Gladbrook Reinbeck and 27-9 to Dike New Hartford... South Winn is better than both those teams and Statistically this would mean Gladbrook Reinbeck is 32 points better than FDSE and DNH is 8 points better than FDSE. South Winn is definitely better than DNH who played them closer than anyone anticipated and probably better than GR. The part that makes scoring comparisons a disaster... I discounted Anamosa for being blow out this week and its weak schedule but they beat LaPorte City who is the only loss for Gladbrook Reinbeck. So with that information you could conclude FDSE is better than WB and SW. This is why it is played on the field. I think the majority of the information we have would conclude that we can't be sure how legit the 3 teams behind ICR and SW are, but we know they could be just as good.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now that I have given some fuel to get DarkThunder and BlameIt all worked up... I am not saying FDSE and WB are not legit, because I believe they are as is IKM-Manning, but until I see wins over better competition I can't definitely say they are legit. Sooooooo, you're saying you're not sure if you are sure.................
Meh, your post was kind of "been there, done that" for me.
(..............meaning about 8-9 years ago, I might have said something similar.)
My take is what you sort of alluded to towards the end. You can't judge a team by comparing scores alone, though I've seen a lot of that on these boards lately.
The other thing is I don't really know what your definition of "legit" is, or at least whom it would be compared to. You never really clarified that.......Is it about their current ranking? As contenders to Regina for the championship? (better not tell Blame that....ehh might be too late now.
)
I just know from some of your past dealings with the word "legit" and who is/isn't, it should only be treated as your opinion, and not that you are actually proving anything with said opinion..........just sayin.
Then again, you didn't seem too sure of anything at the end of your post, anyways....so much ado about nothing, I guess.