Originally posted by tnobd:
Screwloose,
I agree with your statement about Burlington and their schedule....it seems like Keokuk would have been a natural choice for them, but the Purple Chiefs decided to play their local county 2A foe.
I think there was one Des Moines city school match up left out also?
I still am no fan of the 5 team districts. Even 6 teams per district makes 4 games meaningless. But if the goals for districts were to lower travel distances and ease scheduling problems for all the 4A football members ,then those goals were met.
Looks like the state made sure to get all the other metro games they could. Why didn't they make it a priority to get DM Hoover/DM East and CR Prairie/CR Kennedy on there also? If you look at the games that were scheduled instead, it's hard to figure.
DM Hoover plays Urbandale and Waterloo East.
DM East plays Indianola.
CR Kennedy plays Iowa City West, North Scott and Pleasant Valley.
CR Prairie plays Dubuque Senior and North Scott.
Not so jumbled that a few games could have been moved around to accommodate these missing match-ups.
The more I look at it, I think the Burlington schedule was done as a favor to the Davenport public schools, giving them each a game with the Greyhounds. It gives all the parties involved a game with a team at least near their historic level of competition, not shunning one public school over another.
As for the districts, especially the five-teamers, I don't like them either. Namely for the reason you pointed out that five of the games really don't mean anything. I'd really like to see the state get rid of the "rank-and-file", strict district qualifying in favor of open qualifying. If it means a one game waiver for playing a lower class school, so be it. Nobody can tell me that the fifth place team from D6 isn't going to be weaker than the fourth place team from D5 or D8. Opening the east-west boundaries should be the first step into state-wide open qualifying.