ADVERTISEMENT

Are you guys pleased so far with the Infrastructure and CHIPS Acts??

And CHIPS act?

ReasonableHardtofindGermanpinscher-size_restricted.gif
 
The CHIPS Act is seemingly the one thing this administration hasn't fvcked up.

...but there's still time.

If you're cool with the slow march towards socialism and the loss of personal freedoms, then you should continue to bend over for the American left.
 
Sure. Are you happy with inflation and the idea that household appliances in the US are somehow responsible for climate change?
No. It’s not possible because Mt St Helen’s ( 1000s of other geothermal events)?released more combustion byproducts in 1 second than in all the history of humanity since the discovery of fire.

I have stated my opposition to manmade climate change and homosexuality for 20 yrs here. Just in the last two years - you have forgotten that.

I’m opposed to coal burning plants because-I know PERSONALLY from working with the Southern Services lab in 1978 as an intern what poisons are in coal ash - and the lobbies that try to keep it secret.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reasoned
No. It’s not possible because Mt St Helen’s ( 1000s of other geothermal events)?released more combustion byproducts in 1 second than in all the history of humanity since the discovery of fire.

I have stated my opposition to manmade climate change and homosexuality for 20 yrs here. Just in the last two years - you have forgotten that.

I’m opposed to coal burning plants because-I know PERSONALLY from working with the Southern Services lab in 1978 as an intern what poisons are in coal ash - and the lobbies that try to keep it secret.
I haven't forgotten. Just wanted to remind you that the Dem party doesn't agree
 
No. It’s not possible because Mt St Helen’s ( 1000s of other geothermal events)?released more combustion byproducts in 1 second than in all the history of humanity since the discovery of fire.

I have stated my opposition to manmade climate change and homosexuality for 20 yrs here. Just in the last two years - you have forgotten that.

I’m opposed to coal burning plants because-I know PERSONALLY from working with the Southern Services lab in 1978 as an intern what poisons are in coal ash - and the lobbies that try to keep it secret.
Tell us about how clean your solar power is. I’ll save you the Google trouble.
After about 15 years, solar panels lose their effectiveness and are no longer useful, after which they go to waste.
However, this waste is not like ordinary garbage, it is incredibly toxic and poses a significant risk to the environment. In fact, solar panel waste is 300 times more harmful than nuclear waste, and its disposal requires a costly and specialized method. Unfortunately, many countries send this toxic waste to poorer nations.
This issue is only going to get worse as by 2030, we will have 8 million tons of "green" waste, and by 2050, that number will balloon to a staggering 80 million tons of solar panel waste that will likely have reached the end of their lives.
 
No. It’s not possible because Mt St Helen’s ( 1000s of other geothermal events)?released more combustion byproducts in 1 second than in all the history of humanity since the discovery of fire.

I have stated my opposition to manmade climate change and homosexuality for 20 yrs here. Just in the last two years - you have forgotten that.

I’m opposed to coal burning plants because-I know PERSONALLY from working with the Southern Services lab in 1978 as an intern what poisons are in coal ash - and the lobbies that try to keep it secret.

I'd rather not have mountains of coal ash too. Options? Nuclear and natural gas at this point. The green stuff isn't an option because it can't possibly replace the capacity and it's not economically viable.

So yes, coal ash is bad. So is nuclear waste. But going without power would be far worse. Many more would die from a lack of access to reliable energy than will die from coal and nuclear waste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reasoned
Weren’t most of the coal plants converted to LNG during g the Bush ( Cheney) administrations? Check and see.

121 coal plants were converted to burn other fuels between 2011-2019. 103 of these burn LNG. 220 coal plants remain in the US.

So the US has 220 coal plants. China has 1,118. India has 285.


 
  • Like
Reactions: dhetiger
Weren’t most of the coal plants converted to LNG during g the Bush ( Cheney) administrations? Check and see.

Just to be picky, I’m pretty sure the number of coal plants converted to “LNG” in the US is 0. Perhaps there’s a couple out there, but I’ve never come across any.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roosterk
No. It’s not possible because Mt St Helen’s ( 1000s of other geothermal events)?released more combustion byproducts in 1 second than in all the history of humanity since the discovery of fire.

I have stated my opposition to manmade climate change and homosexuality for 20 yrs here. Just in the last two years - you have forgotten that.

I’m opposed to coal burning plants because-I know PERSONALLY from working with the Southern Services lab in 1978 as an intern what poisons are in coal ash - and the lobbies that try to keep it secret.

greta-how-dare-you.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT